Proceedings of the 2026 3rd International Conference on Applied Economics, Management Science and Social Development (AEMSS 2026)

Regime-Dependent Volatility Dynamics: Evidence from Time-Series Analysis

Authors
Kai Cheng1, *, Xiaoxi Qi2, Zhiyuan Cheng3, Longying Lai4, Xuan Liu5
1Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
2Department of Economics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
3School of Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
4Simon Business School, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
5Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
*Corresponding author. Email: kc2859@columbia.edu
Corresponding Author
Kai Cheng
Available Online 12 May 2026.
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6239-672-2_18How to use a DOI?
Keywords
Volatility modeling; Regime-dependent analysis; Time-series methods; Risk measurement; Applied statistics
Abstract

This paper examines the volatility hedging role of precious metals against U.S. stock market risk from a regime-based perspective. While a large literature documents the safe-haven properties of precious metals—particularly gold—based on price or return behavior during periods of market stress, far less is known about their effectiveness in hedging market volatility itself. This distinction is crucial, as price-level diversification does not necessarily imply a reduction in market uncertainty. Using volatility measures constructed from daily price data, the study investigates the relationship between precious metals volatility and stock market volatility across different market regimes defined by the periods before, during, and after the global financial crisis. The empirical results reveal pronounced regime dependence and asset heterogeneity in volatility hedging effectiveness. Gold, despite exhibiting price-level divergence from equity markets consistent with a safe-haven role, tends to co-move with stock market volatility across most regimes, indicating that its widely documented hedging properties do not extend to volatility risk. In contrast, other precious metals display more heterogeneous and regime-dependent volatility relationships, with limited evidence of volatility hedging emerging only under specific market conditions. Overall, the findings help reconcile conflicting evidence in the literature by highlighting the conceptual difference between price-based safe-haven behavior and volatility-based hedging, and they underscore the importance of explicitly accounting for market regimes when evaluating the risk management role of precious metals.

Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2026 3rd International Conference on Applied Economics, Management Science and Social Development (AEMSS 2026)
Series
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
Publication Date
12 May 2026
ISBN
978-94-6239-672-2
ISSN
2352-5428
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6239-672-2_18How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Kai Cheng
AU  - Xiaoxi Qi
AU  - Zhiyuan Cheng
AU  - Longying Lai
AU  - Xuan Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/05/12
TI  - Regime-Dependent Volatility Dynamics: Evidence from Time-Series Analysis
BT  - Proceedings of the 2026 3rd International Conference on Applied Economics, Management Science and Social Development (AEMSS 2026)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 179
EP  - 189
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-672-2_18
DO  - 10.2991/978-94-6239-672-2_18
ID  - Cheng2026
ER  -