Legal Implications of the Advisory Council Regulations Perspective Trial of the Presidential System of Government

DOI

10.2991/978-2-38476-491-4_14How to use a DOI?

Keywords

Legal Implications; DPA; Government System Presidential

Abstract

This study centers on the critical nature and legal consequences of reinstating the Supreme Advisory Council (DPA). In the draft legislation amending Law no. 19 of 2006 related to Wantimpres, the name was suggested to be DPA. If the authority is identical to Wantipres, there is no necessity to alter the DPA’s name to avoid confusion in interpretation, and so forth. Should this institution operate alongside other state institutions, it may lead to issues for the presidential governmental system and, conversely, contradict the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This study highlights the importance of determining the urgency of creating the Supreme Advisory Council and examines the legal ramifications of its establishment from the viewpoint of the presidential governance system. The research method employs a normative approach, with sources of legal materials encompassing primary and secondary legal materials. Techniques for gathering these materials involve library research and internet studies, followed by qualitative descriptive analysis. The theories employed for analysis consist of state institution theories and presidential government system theories. This study is a way of contemplating to offer answers to governmental organizational structures. This research results in scientific articles published in the Law Journal. In studies regarding urgency, there is decidedly no immediate need to reinstate the DPA within the state administration framework, as it would lead to disorder in the presidential system due to the necessity of amending the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Copyright

© 2025 The Author(s)

Open Access

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

TY  - CONF
AU  - Catur Wido Haruni
AU  - Moh. Risqi Fadjar Romadhani
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/11/18
TI  - Legal Implications of the Advisory Council Regulations Perspective Trial of the Presidential System of Government
BT  - Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2025)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 152
EP  - 163
SN  - 2352-5398
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-491-4_14
DO  - 10.2991/978-2-38476-491-4_14
ID  - Haruni2025
ER  -