Proceedings of the 2024 2th International Conference on Economic Management, Financial Innovation and Public Service (EMFIPS 2024)

The Legal Nature of Administrative Blacklists from a Judicial Perspective

Authors
Yinuo Kong1, *
1Master of Law, Sydney law school, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
*Corresponding author. Email: kongyinuo2002@163.com
Corresponding Author
Yinuo Kong
Available Online 7 May 2025.
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6463-706-9_52How to use a DOI?
Keywords
administrative blacklists; judicial review; legal nature; justiciability
Abstract

With the advancement of the social integrity system, China has widely implemented the administrative blacklist system as a tool for administrative management. However, there are significant differences in judicial practice regarding the legal nature of the administrative blacklist, which has resulted in hindrances to the protection of the rights of those affected. Through an analysis of the determination of the nature of administrative blacklists in judicial decisions, this study has identified two main decision modes: the dual-order construction path and the single-order behavioural path. The former considers blacklisted behaviours as antecedent behaviours that do not produce actual impacts, while the latter may determine that the blacklisted behaviours have actual impacts on the rights of those involved. Through a thorough analysis of the adjudication logic of these two paths and their legal effects, this study has revealed the problems in the current judicial determination, including limitations in formal argumentation and insufficient protection of the rights of those affected. Building on this analysis, the study proposes the principle of substantively resolving administrative disputes and suggests that judicial review should prioritize the substantive impact of administrative acts to ensure effective remediation of the legitimate rights and interests of those affected. By standardizing and clarifying the substantive and procedural aspects of administrative blacklist cases in judicial review, this study aims to provide a theoretical basis for optimizing the administrative blacklist system and promoting the construction of the rule of law and the soundness of the social integrity system.

Copyright
© 2025 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Download article (PDF)

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2024 2th International Conference on Economic Management, Financial Innovation and Public Service (EMFIPS 2024)
Series
Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research
Publication Date
7 May 2025
ISBN
978-94-6463-706-9
ISSN
2352-5428
DOI
10.2991/978-94-6463-706-9_52How to use a DOI?
Copyright
© 2025 The Author(s)
Open Access
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

Cite this article

TY  - CONF
AU  - Yinuo Kong
PY  - 2025
DA  - 2025/05/07
TI  - The Legal Nature of Administrative Blacklists from a Judicial Perspective
BT  - Proceedings of the 2024 2th International Conference on Economic Management, Financial Innovation and Public Service (EMFIPS 2024)
PB  - Atlantis Press
SP  - 582
EP  - 593
SN  - 2352-5428
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-706-9_52
DO  - 10.2991/978-94-6463-706-9_52
ID  - Kong2025
ER  -